Belated appeal due to Advocate's laxity couldn't be condoned as I-T officers were supposed to take follow-up
IT : Appeal filed by revenue pending for non-removal of office objection ought to be followed up not only by Advocate for revenue but also by revenue officials in-charge of initiating litigation and therefore merely because revenue's Advocate owned up mistake or lapse, delay would not be condoned automatically as departmental official must also give explanation for not being in touch with Advocate and following matter in question
Regards
Prarthana Jalan
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment