----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Kapil Goel <advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com>
To: CA.KAPIL GOEL <kapilnkgoelandco@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013 3:17 AM
Subject: [Gzb_CA Group -CA. VINAY MITTAL] Fwd: today's order ITAT following Rajasthan high court on scope of section 153A incriminating material must (Rajasthan high court applied) [2 Attachments]
From: Kapil Goel <advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com>
To: CA.KAPIL GOEL <kapilnkgoelandco@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013 3:17 AM
Subject: [Gzb_CA Group -CA. VINAY MITTAL] Fwd: today's order ITAT following Rajasthan high court on scope of section 153A incriminating material must (Rajasthan high court applied) [2 Attachments]
Interesting proposition laid down down
During
proceedings before us the bench had asked a question to Ld. AR as to
whether any statement u/s 132(4) was recorded during search to which the
Ld. AR replied in negative and Ld. Departmental Representative also
showed his ignorance about such statement. This question was asked
because the view of the Bench is that if during course of search some
statement is recorded u/s 132(4) and, in that statement certain facts are
recorded from the interpretation of which Assessing Officer could
conclude that there was some undisclosed income, then that statement can
be considered as incriminating material. Recently, Hon'ble Rajasthan High
Court in judgment delivered on 24.05.2013 in the case of Jai Steel (India)
u/s ACIT has also dealt with similar circumstances and has held that where
no incriminating document is found during search, addition cannot be
made. In this case, on the reopening of cases u/s 153A, the assessee had
claimed certain deductions which were not claimed in original assessment
proceedings, however Hon'ble Court has held that Assessing Officer is not
free to disturb the income, expenditure or deduction de hors any
incriminating material while making the assessment u/s 153A
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment