| All govt banks violate Sebi listing norms, says Nayak |
|
Mumbai, 14 May Former Axis Bank chairman and Morgan Stanley India chief, P J Nayak, who headed the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI) — appointed committee on governance requirement at banks, says one of the focus areas of his report is providing a level playing field to public- sector banks (PSBs), which are facing deep stress. In a wide- ranging interaction with Business Standard— his first after giving the report that RBI made public on Wednesday — Nayak said, contrary to some misleading reports, the committee did not make any case for privatisation of PSBs. Rather, it focused on an urgent need to remove discriminatory external shackles, so that these banks could compete fairly with private peers. The shackles included the government's failure in distancing itself from several governance functions and dual regulation by the RBI and the government. For example, Nayak said, there were almost no independent directors on the boards of government banks, despite the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) regulation for listed companies mandating that 50 per cent of directors must be independent. " This is wholesale violation of Sebi's listing requirements. We have to bring everything under the Companies Act." Nayak said the Bank Nationalisation Act talked about eight different categories of boards of directors. Similarly, the SBI Act had seven different categories of directors. This, he said, was like splitting the board into tiny components and finding people for each component. The companies law, on the other hand, has three categories of directors — fulltime directors, part- time directors and irrespective of ownership, Nayak said the report talked about many banks that defied ownership logic. Bank of Nainital, despite Bank of Baroda having a 99 per cent ownership stake in it, is classified as an old private- sector bank. ING Vysya Bank, in which ING ( 42 per cent stake) is adding the chief executive of BIC should be a professional banker or someone who has worked in the private equity sector. The return he delivers on the capital he manages is a major parameter by which his performance will be analysed. "The choice for the government is obvious. I am sure it wants the banks it owns to be well governed, by giving it to aprofessional intermediate investment company," he said. Nayak said the committee identified many other areas where government banks did not have a level playing field. On the contentious proposal to reduce the government's stake to below 50 per cent, he said it would actually be a good bargain for the government, which would still remain the owner of these banks. Turn to Page 15 > "I have no idea whether the govt would agree with the contents of the report. I can only hope the RBI can use this document in its dialogue with the finance ministry" PJ NAYAK Head of RBI panel on bank governance OPINION 11 > >EDIT: Banking on governance |
|
|
| Click: Article continued from…All govt banks violate Sebi listing norms, says Nayak
|
|
Nayak also said he had no idea whether the government would agree with the contents of the report. " I can only hope the RBI can use this document in its dialogue with the finance ministry." Giving examples of how governments encroached on the RBIs turf, Nayak said the instruction on uniform card rates for deposits were against the interest of depositors and also against the RBI policy of deregulated interest rates. If telecom or FMCG companies could compete on prices, there was no reason why banks could not compete as well, he said. The first step, he said, was to empower public- sector banks boards, which should choose the CEO. For example, DBS is the foremost bank in Singapore and its board selects the CEO, though the bank is owned by Temasek, which is a private equity fund owned by the Singapore government. On private sector banks, Nayak said it was a good idea for an entrepreneur to be a CEO, provided the bank was governed by an adequately independent and professional board. On allowing private bank promoters to retain 25 per cent stake, against the current limit of 15 per cent within 12 years, Nayak said promoters would have little incentive left if the maximum shareholding was set very low. In Indonesia, he said, a 25 per cent stake was defined as acontrolling stake. |
|
|
This mail and its attachments (if any) are confidential information intended for persons to whom the email is planned for delivery by the sender. If you have received this mail in error please notify the sender of the error by forwarding the email and its attachments (if any) and then deleting the mail received in error and the relevant email trail in this connection without making any copies or taking any prints.
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment