[aaykarbhavan] Fw: Pre-Print Highlights of GSTR from CLI, Judgements and Information [3 Attachments]
On Monday, 4 August 2014 6:44 AM, "info@cliofindia.com" <info@cliofindia.com> wrote:
| |  www.cliofindia.com info@cliofindia.com
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX REPORTS (GSTR) HIGHLIGHTS F Failure to provide opportunity of cross-examination amounts to violation of principles of natural justice : Commissioner of Central Excise v. Kurele Pan Products P. Ltd. (All) p. 273
F Recovery of duty without adjudication of disputed taxes not permissible : Technomaint Contractors Ltd. v. Union of India (Guj) p. 277
F Where goods abandoned by importer or purchaser, supplier's request for return of goods through re-export cannot be denied : ZTE Corporation v. Commissioner of Customs (Delhi) p. 354
F Where matter relating to determination of status of 100 per cent. export-oriented unit, rate of duty and value of goods for purpose of assessment, appeal not maintainable to High Court : Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax v. Jubilant Life Sciences Ltd. (All) p. 363
F Amount paid towards transfer of technology not being amount other than payment made to foreign supplier as condition of sale and to be added to assessable value of goods : Skoda Auto India P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Trib.-Mum) p. 280
F Where relevant documents suppressed to avoid payment of duty, invocation of extended period of limitation proper : Skoda Auto India P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Trib.-Mum) p. 280
F Officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence deemed to have power of assessment and proper officers for purpose of section 28 : Skoda Auto India P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Trib.-Mum) p. 280
F No proof of party who vetted agreements and ensured that agreements were in terms of law, advised or assisting assessee in planning to ensure undervaluation of goods, penalty not imposable : Skoda Auto India P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Trib.-Mum) p. 280
F Where goods not available for confiscation, redemption fine cannot be imposed : Skoda Auto India P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Trib.-Mum) p. 280
F When rule 5(1) had been struck down argument that assessees had not fulfilled conditions of rule 5(2) of 2006 Rules, not relevant : Aashita International Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax (Trib.-Ahd) p. 330
F Whether assessee failed in its undertaking to fulfil terms of agreement entered into with Government, requiring fresh adjudication and matter remanded : Avanti Feeds Ltd. v.Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (Trib.-Bang) p. 335
COMPANY LAW INSTITUTE OF INDIA PVT. LTD.
No. 2, Vaithyaram Street,
T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017.
Phone: (044) 24350752 - 55
Fax: (044) 24322015
info@cliofindia.com
| To Unsubscribe : Reply back with "Unsubscribe" in subject followed by the key word "ITR" or "CC" or "VST" or "GSTR" or "ITR (Trib)", respectively or "All" if you do not want any Email. ITR : Income Tax Reports, CC : Company Cases, VST : VAT and Service Tax Cases, GSTR : Goods and Service Tax Reports, ITR (Trib) : ITR'S Tribunal Tax Reports. Also send your feedback or comments to info@cliofindia.com |
__._,_.___
View attachments on the web
Posted by: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.
To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com 
No comments:
Post a Comment