Monday, June 10, 2013

[aaykarbhavan] Business standard news updates 11-6-2013



YES Bank promoters may opt to settle dispute out of court


SOMASROY CHAKRABORTY

Kolkata, 10 June

The dispute between YES Bank promoters —Rana Kapoor and Madhu Ashok Kapur ( widow of co- founder Ashok Kapur) — might be heading for an out- of- court settlement, with both parties appearing to be in favour of such an arrangement, according to people familiar with the developments.

"It will be nice, as nobody wants asituation like this. We will certainly favour an out- of- court settlement," aperson close to Madhu

Kapur told Business Standard,

requesting anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

In 2009, a few months after Ashok Kapur's death in the 26/ 11 Mumbai terror attack, Madhu Kapur had requested the bank for a board position but the proposal was rejected.

Earlier this month, she requested the bank to appoint her daughter, Shagun Kapur Gogia, as her nominee board member.

Kapur then filed a petition in the Bombay High Court, requesting a stay on the bank's annual general meeting ( AGM) and alleged she had not been consulted on the appointment of three directors — Diwan Arun Nanda, Ravish Chopra and MR Srinivasan — in violation of the bank's articles of association.

While the court refused to order a stay on the AGM, it directed YES Bank to advance its board meeting by amonth to June 27 and consider Gogia's appointment as a director on the bank's board.

"YES Bank Chairman MR Srinivasan and Rana Kapoor had offered to discuss Shagun's appointment in the bank's next board meeting ( originally scheduled on July 24) even before the court order. They had offered to resolve the dispute through discussion. So, there is scope for this matter to be settled outside of court," said another person familiar with the development.

A source indicated the disagreement between the promoters was primarily over the right to nominate directors on the board of the bank.

"Whether or not Shagun should be appointed is secondary. According to the articles of association, the family of Ashok Kapur has the right to nominate directors on the bank's board. That right needs to be protected," the person said, adding the dispute could be resolved if the bank allows Madhu Kapur to nominate directors.

Another person confirmed both the parties were in favour of an outofcourt settlement, saying: " Both the groups need to reach an agreement; Iam confident that it is possible." The next hearing on the case is scheduled for July 1.

SPECIAL

Coverage > YES Bank directors reluctantly in the spotlight >Bank to raise $500 mn this year >Bank chief earned 25% more in FY13 >Reschedule board meet to June 27: HC

FINANCE II, 4 >

Sebi to mull new buyback   norms, fewer FII routes


SAMIE MODAK

Mumbai, 10 June

The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) will review norms governing share buybacks, foreigners' equity investments into the country and listings of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) when its board meets later this month.

The capital market regulator might bring in rules to shorten the buyback period and put greater onus on companies that embark on such share purchases. " The overhaul of buyback regulations done through open market purchases could be an important item on the agenda," said asenior Sebi official. Its board is scheduled to meet on June 25.

Sebi plans to increase purchase obligations in share buybacks and bring on more post- offer obligations. The regulator, in January, had released adiscussion paper for modification of the framework for share buyback done through the open market route.

The paper proposes to mandate companies to buy back at least 50 per cent of the announced quantity and to put 25 per cent of the maximum buyback amount in an escrow account. It also recommends to shorten the timeframe to just three months from one year at present. Further, it also proposes to bar companies from raising capital for two years, post buyback.

Experts said the market regulator was more likely to come out with a' watered down' version of the discussion paper. Sebi has already announced key changes to buybacks done through the tender method. However, over 95 per cent buyback done in the country was through the open market route.

While the Sebi official declined to divulge anything further about the board meeting, people in the know said Sebi might also take up the issue of rationalisation of foreign institutional investor ( FII) investment routes.

The regulator is likely to merge certain FII routes into one and announce a new risk- weighted KYC ( Know Your Customer) framework for different categories of foreign investors.

In December, Sebi had set up a committee headed by former cabinet secretary K M Chandrasekhar to take steps for implementation of the report of the Working Committee Group on Foreign Investment in India ( WCGFII) and suggest measures for combining various foreign portfolio investment routes into one.

The expert group was entrusted with the job to study the operational issues in merging the FII routes and suggest ways for smooth implementation.

Sources said the committee has completed its review and will give its report to Sebi this week.

At present, foreign investors can invest through various routes including foreign direct investment, foreign institutional investment, foreign venture capital investment and as qualified foreign investors.

Incidentally, the WCGFII, set up by the finance ministry, was headed by UK Sinha, the then chief of UTI Mutual Fund.

Further, the Sebi board could also bring in a new framework for listing of SMES without an initial public offering or compulsory fund raising, an announcement made during the Union Budget said.

The regulator has set up an expert panel of officials drawn from stock exchanges, legal and private equity firms, to suggest new guidelines. The group has already held three meetings and is likely to make the final recommendations soon.

Sources said the Sebi board would also be apprised of the minimum public shareholding drive and discuss if any further action needs to be taken against companies that have failed to comply. The threeweek timeframe provided by Sebi for non- compliant companies to respond to its showcause notice ends on June 25.

Sebi to mull new buyback

Board meeting on June 25

 

reluctantly in the spotlight


SOMASROY CHAKRABORTY

Kolkata, 10 June

The induction of directors on a bank's board seldom gets the kind of attention that the appointments of Diwan Arun Nanda, Ravish Chopra and M R Srinivasan on YES Bank's board have got.

The proposals to appoint them as directors in the annual shareholders' meet was contested by the bank's cofounder Ashok Kapur's widow Madhu Kapur, who holds 12 per cent stake in YES Bank.

The private lender resorted to paper balloting and, overall, 57 per cent of the total shareholder ownership votes were polled. The resolutions seeking these appointments were passed with amajority of about 80 per cent.

Nanda, aged 69 years, is the founder and promoter of Rediffusion, acommunication and advertising agency in India with a nationwide presence. An alumnus of the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, Nanda has directorship in 10 companies (as of March 31, 2013) including Rediffusion DY& R, Rediff. com India, Oriental Hotels, and Clariant Chemicals. At YES Bank, he is the chairman of board remuneration committee and member of nominations and governance committee, service excellence committee and a special committee on capital raising. Chopra, 65 years, has worked with the HSBC Group for nearly 44 years and served in India, Hong Kong and the United Kingdom ( UK). Prior to his appointment as director of YES Bank, he was managing director of HSBC Private Bank UK.

A graduate in economics from the University of Delhi, Chopra is known for his strong relationships with the non- resident community in the South East Asia, West Asia and the UK. He has headed HSBC's investment bank in India in the 1980s and launched the credit cards, custodial services and consumer banking services.

Chopra does not hold any directorship other than in YES Bank. Srinivasan had worked for 35 years with the Reserve Bank of India and was the chief general manager in charge of banking operations and development. He has also acted as executive director and banking advisor to IDBI and was IDBI's nominee director in IDBI Bank.

Srinivasan has also been associated with multilateral organisations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank. A graduate in commerce from Madras University and a certified associate from the Indian Institute of Bankers, Srinivasan is the chairman of YES Bank's risk monitoring committee and member of audit and compliance committee. He does not hold any directorships other than in YES Bank.

The warrant route to compliance


The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has kept its promise by coming down hard on the promoters who failed to bring down stakes below the 75 per cent mark. Some of the 105 companies are already falling in line with Adani Ports and Sundaram Clayton filing offer documents to sell shares through the less- used institutional placement programme (IPP). Meanwhile, industry body Assocham has asked Sebi to consider athree- month extension in deadline, terming the moves as " harsh".

Assocham seems to have a point. A sale is not a unilateral transaction. Just because somebody wants to sell, it is not necessary that a sale would happen. Even if shares are sold for free, it is the prerogative of the buyer to take it or not. If there were no takers should this be held against the company or promoters? For example, on June 3, Essar Ports, BGR Energy and Omaxe put their shares on the block. But, they could not sell enough to meet the 25 per cent public holding mark. Now, is this entirely the company's fault? Should these companies not be treated differently from willful defaulters? Unfortunately, these three also figure in the list of defaulters and have to suffer several penal actions. One can take the argument that the rules were in public domain for three years and the companies could have sold the shares earlier. But like Assocham says, the times were not very conducive.

The body said in a statement on Sunday, " While it is true that it has been three years since Sebi had asked listed firms to take firm steps to increase public holding, it must also be realised that selling stocks in the marketplace is a function of sentiments or else the promoters would be compelled to offload equity at a distress price. This is particularly true about the small and midcap companies." It is not the business of the market regulator to ensure good valuations for the promoter. But Sebi has, in the recent past, allowed significant additional time for compliance of promoter holding norms in the case of MCX Stock Exchange (MCX- SX).

MCX- SX interpreted rules for a similar stake paring, though under a different law/ regulation, in an innovative manner by issuing warrants in lieu of shares. Though the promoter had all the time in the world to bring down stakes, it was argued that due to Sebi actions buyers fled and the seller could do little and so on. Therefore, under a scheme of arrangement, warrants were issued in lieu of shares to the extent of the excess shareholding.

Thus, while the promoters had the voting rights to the extent allowed in law, they continued to have a much higher economic interest. After a protracted legal battle, Sebi agreed to allow the exchange an extended timeline to bring down the interest held through warrants, while giving it permission to do normal business.

Sebi's innovative measure of freezing of proportionate voting rights of promoters in the order against 105 firms seems to be a converse of the MCXSX formula. By logical extension, affected companies should then check with the regulator whether they will be allowed to issue warrants to the extent of non- compliance and sell these off at their convenience. What applied to Peter should apply to Paul, too.

STREET FOOD

NSUNDARESHA SUBRAMANIAN

Sebi's measure of freezing proportionate voting rights of promoters of 105 companies seems to be a converse of the MCX- SX formula

 



--
 
CS A  RENGARAJAN,, B.Com ,FCS, LLB, PGDBM
Company Secretary, Chennai
CONVENOR, CHENNAI WEST STUDY CIRCLE ICSI-SIRC
email csarengarajan@gmail.com
mobile 093810 11200

CS Benevolent Fund is a collective effort towards extending the much needed financial support to the community of Company Secretaries in times of distress  Let us lend support and join for noble cause.



SHARING KNOWLEDGE SKY IS THE LIMIT

This mail and its attachments (if any) are confidential information intended for persons to whom the email is planned for delivery by the sender. If you have received this mail in error please notify the sender of the error by forwarding the email and its attachments (if any) and then deleting the mail received in error and the relevant email trail in this connection without making any copies or taking any prints.


__._,_.___


receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.

To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment