I think this practice is very much against the code of I T O , being in chair of Judiciary !!!!!!!!!!! and also against natural justice. This process of Income Tax Officer is dangerous also. One should take note of it and brought to higher authority , CCIT for knowledge ....
Per Civil Procedure Code this is against ....... I T O is working under Civil Procedure Code also. He has to comply with the process of Civil Procedure Code carefully. Unbias on both the side.
C A Shah D J
USA
From: BHOOPENDAR MAHESHWARI <bhoopi101@gmail.com>
To: C A Dipak Jain <djain128@gmail.com>; C A Krishanlal Bansal <klbansal@gmail.com>; C A Madhusoodan Kakkad. <camnkakkad@gmail.com>; C A of Thane <ThaneCAs@yahoogroups.com>; "pdrungta@gmail.com" <pdrungta@gmail.com>; "sensitiveadvisor2008@yahoogroups.co.in" <sensitiveadvisor2008@yahoogroups.co.in>; bhilai-ca <bhilai-ca@yahoogroups.com>; "ca expert team@yahoogroups.com" <ca_expert_team@yahoogroups.com>; C A Tony M P <trc_mptony@yahoo.com>; "panipat_ca@yahoogroups.com" <panipat_ca@yahoogroups.com>; C A K L Bansal <klbansal2007@gmail.com>; "CAForumHyd@yahoogroups.com" <CAForumHyd@yahoogroups.com>; "Ranchi_Chartered_Accountants@yahoogroups.com" <Ranchi_Chartered_Accountants@yahoogroups.com>; "shaharpitca@yahoo.com" <shaharpitca@yahoo.com>; "company_secretary-owner@yahoogroups.com" <company_secretary-owner@yahoogroups.com>; Aarchana Yadav <aarchanay@gmail.com>; "servicetaxandvat@yahoogroups.com" <servicetaxandvat@yahoogroups.com>; "cause-of-ca@googlegroups.com" <cause-of-ca@googlegroups.com>; chartered accountant <Chartered_accountant@yahoogroups.com>; "chartered accountant of chhattisgarh@yahoogroups.com" <chartered_accountant_of_chhattisgarh@yahoogroups.com>; "aaykarbhavan@yahoogroups.com" <aaykarbhavan@yahoogroups.com>; C A Dahisar Group of Mumbai <dahisarcas@yahoogroups.co.in>; "CaCmaCsLinks@yahoogroups.co.in" <CaCmaCsLinks@yahoogroups.co.in>; lucknow C A Group <lucknow-ca@yahoogroups.com>; "join_mtc@googlegroups.co" <join_mtc@googlegroups.co>; "CA_UPDATE@yahoogroups.com" <CA_UPDATE@yahoogroups.com>; "ghaziabad_ca@yahoogroups.com" <ghaziabad_ca@yahoogroups.com>; "kanpur_cs@yahoogroups.com" <kanpur_cs@yahoogroups.com>; IT Case Law Library <it_law_reported@yahoogroups.com>; "NEXTGEN-CA@yahoogroups.com" <NEXTGEN-CA@yahoogroups.com>; Nitesh More <moreassociate@gmail.com>; New Delhi CA forum <new_delhi_ca@yahoogroups.com>; ICAI_CIRC_MEERUT_CA-owner@yahoogroups.com; djshah1944@yahoo.com; editor@itatonline.org; itatonline.org@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, 15 June 2013 1:33 AM
Subject: Case law required in favour of assessee though agreed for certain disallowance
Per Civil Procedure Code this is against ....... I T O is working under Civil Procedure Code also. He has to comply with the process of Civil Procedure Code carefully. Unbias on both the side.
C A Shah D J
USA
From: BHOOPENDAR MAHESHWARI <bhoopi101@gmail.com>
To: C A Dipak Jain <djain128@gmail.com>; C A Krishanlal Bansal <klbansal@gmail.com>; C A Madhusoodan Kakkad. <camnkakkad@gmail.com>; C A of Thane <ThaneCAs@yahoogroups.com>; "pdrungta@gmail.com" <pdrungta@gmail.com>; "sensitiveadvisor2008@yahoogroups.co.in" <sensitiveadvisor2008@yahoogroups.co.in>; bhilai-ca <bhilai-ca@yahoogroups.com>; "ca expert team@yahoogroups.com" <ca_expert_team@yahoogroups.com>; C A Tony M P <trc_mptony@yahoo.com>; "panipat_ca@yahoogroups.com" <panipat_ca@yahoogroups.com>; C A K L Bansal <klbansal2007@gmail.com>; "CAForumHyd@yahoogroups.com" <CAForumHyd@yahoogroups.com>; "Ranchi_Chartered_Accountants@yahoogroups.com" <Ranchi_Chartered_Accountants@yahoogroups.com>; "shaharpitca@yahoo.com" <shaharpitca@yahoo.com>; "company_secretary-owner@yahoogroups.com" <company_secretary-owner@yahoogroups.com>; Aarchana Yadav <aarchanay@gmail.com>; "servicetaxandvat@yahoogroups.com" <servicetaxandvat@yahoogroups.com>; "cause-of-ca@googlegroups.com" <cause-of-ca@googlegroups.com>; chartered accountant <Chartered_accountant@yahoogroups.com>; "chartered accountant of chhattisgarh@yahoogroups.com" <chartered_accountant_of_chhattisgarh@yahoogroups.com>; "aaykarbhavan@yahoogroups.com" <aaykarbhavan@yahoogroups.com>; C A Dahisar Group of Mumbai <dahisarcas@yahoogroups.co.in>; "CaCmaCsLinks@yahoogroups.co.in" <CaCmaCsLinks@yahoogroups.co.in>; lucknow C A Group <lucknow-ca@yahoogroups.com>; "join_mtc@googlegroups.co" <join_mtc@googlegroups.co>; "CA_UPDATE@yahoogroups.com" <CA_UPDATE@yahoogroups.com>; "ghaziabad_ca@yahoogroups.com" <ghaziabad_ca@yahoogroups.com>; "kanpur_cs@yahoogroups.com" <kanpur_cs@yahoogroups.com>; IT Case Law Library <it_law_reported@yahoogroups.com>; "NEXTGEN-CA@yahoogroups.com" <NEXTGEN-CA@yahoogroups.com>; Nitesh More <moreassociate@gmail.com>; New Delhi CA forum <new_delhi_ca@yahoogroups.com>; ICAI_CIRC_MEERUT_CA-owner@yahoogroups.com; djshah1944@yahoo.com; editor@itatonline.org; itatonline.org@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, 15 June 2013 1:33 AM
Subject: Case law required in favour of assessee though agreed for certain disallowance
Dear All,
I need a case law passed in favour of assessee, where ,though assessee had agreed for certain disallowance , but went into appeal and won the case. This is because
Now a days many assessing officers are writing in their order sheet that, "AS AGREED BY ASSESSEE OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE certain amount or certain percentage is disallowed". This is to discourage the asseesse's not to go in appeal. The officers take a u turn, after agreeing for ........ and disallowing more . This has happened in one of my clients case and the disallowance made was double the agreed amount .
Kindly answer the query. Thanks in advance..
Bhoopendar Maheshwari
09821675254
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment