Monday, November 10, 2014

[aaykarbhavan] source Business standard





RBI  tightens  norms  for  NBFCs

 

BS REPORTER

Mumbai, 10 November

In a bid to bring non- banking financial company (NBFC) norms in line with those of banks, the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI) on Monday unleashed tighter rules for NBFCs. According to the new guidelines, NBFCs will require higher minimum capital, have less time to declare bad loans, and a board- approved fit and proper criteria for director appointments.

The new norms, which will be implemented in a phased manner, are made applicable for NBFCs that manage funds worth ₹ 500 crore and for those that accept public deposits. The central bank will also start granting fresh NBFC licences.

"A lighter regulatory framework has been placed on NBFCs other than for those with large asset sizes and deposit accepting. For NBFCs with large asset sizes, and for all deposit- accepting NBFCs, regulations have been harmonised across NBFCs, and to some extent, with banks," said RBI, adding that the intent was to create a level- playing field that does not unduly favour any institution.

To harmonise the deposit acceptance regulations across all deposit- taking NBFCs ( NBFCsD) and move to a regime of only credit- rated NBFCs- D accessing public deposits, existing unrated asset finance companies ( AFCs) have been asked to get themselves rated by March 31, 2016. " Those AFCs that do not get an investment grade rating by March 31, 2016, will not be allowed to renew existing or accept fresh deposits thereafter," RBI noted.

According to current regulations, an asset is classified as non- performing when it remains overdue for six months or more for loans and overdue for 12 months or more in case of lease rental and hire- purchase instalments, compared with 90 days for banks.

The new norms proposed to reduce the period in a phased manner so that the norms are at par with banks by March 31, 2018.

In the past, NBFCs had opposed this on two grounds. One, their borrowers generally come from the unorganised and informal sections of the economy. There are often some difficulties in repayment of due to issues such as fuel cost increase, insurance and so forth but this doesn't essentially translate into default. Also, NBFCs don't get any tax benefit on their provisioning, while banks do.

Vibha Batra, senior vice- president and cohead (financial sector rating) at ICRA, said the revised norms are balanced but there would be short- term pain. " The economy is picking up and the regulator has a long transition period to meet stringent asset quality norms," she said.

Similarly, provisioning for standard assets, which is 0.25 per cent for NBFCs now, is proposed to be increased to 0.40 per cent by March 2018, in line with banks.

On capital, however, larger and deposit- taking NBFCs will have to increase their minimum tier- 1 capital adequacy ratio to 10 per cent by March 2017, from 7.5 per cent now. The overall capital adequacy ratio ( asset size of ₹ 100 crore), has been retained at 15 per cent.

The regulator has also tightened the corporate governance and disclosure norms for NBFCs. Besides that, RBI said NBFCs that are part of a corporate group or are floated by a common set of promoters, will not be viewed on astandalone basis.

Raises capital requirement, proposes stricter NPA guidelines; norms to be introduced in a phased manner by April 2018; aim to bring norms on a par with those for banks QUICK COMPARISON OF NBFC NORMS

NEW NORM EXISTING NORM

Mandated minimum ~ 2 cr by the end of March 2017; ~1 crore by the end of March 2016 Minimum netowned fund for firms in existence before April 21, 1999, was retained at ~ 0.25 cr

NET OWNED FUND

Will have to get themselves rated by March 31, 2016 Unrated company complying with rules of netowned fund, prudential norms and capital adequacy allowed to accept or renewpublic deposits

UNRATED ASSET FINANCE COMPANIES

Non- deposit taking NBFCs with assets less than ~500 crore and systemically important NBFCs with assets of over ~ 500 crore Non- deposit taking NBFCs with assets less than ~ 100 crore and non– deposit taking systemically important NBFCs with assets of ~ 100 crore and above

NBFC CATEGORIES

Non- deposit taking NBFCs with asset size of ~ 500 crore and above and all deposit- taking NBFCs to maintain minimum Tier- I capital of 10% by the end of March 2017; 8.5% by the end of March 2016 All deposit- taking NBFCs and non- deposit taking NBFCs with asset size of ~ 100 crore to have minimum Tier- I capital of 7.5%

TIER- 1 CAPITAL

Those for non– deposit taking systemically important NBFCs and deposit- taking NBFCs made in line with those for banks ( 90 days) Asset classified as NPAwhen it remains overdue for six months or more for loans, overdue for 12 months or more in case of lease rental and hire purchase instalments

ASSET CLASSIFICATION NORMS

Provision for standard assets for non– deposit taking systemically important NBFCs and deposit- taking NBFCs increased to 0.40% |0.30% by the end of March 2016 |0.35% by the end of March 2017 |0.40% by the end of March 2018 Provision for standard assets at 0.25% of the outstanding

Source: Reserve Bank of India

PROVISION FOR STANDARD ASSETS

Norms to allow faster delisting likely soon


JAYSHREE P UPADHYAY

Mumbai, 10 November

Companies could soon find it simpler to delist from a stock exchange. Sources indicate the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) is likely to clear an easier process at its board meeting on the 19th of this month. Delisting is a process by which a listed company, whose shares are traded on the stock exchange platform, is taken off the bourse by buying shares back from public shareholders. The shares of delisted companies can no longer be bought or sold through the exchange route.

The key regulatory changes include reducing the time required for delisting from 137 days to around 75 days, a onetime nod from shareholders and stock exchanges, and a requirement for a minimum of 25 per cent of public shareholders to participate in the delisting.

In May this year, the market regulator floated a discussion paper to ease the process. In the paper, Sebi had incorporated suggestions on removing the requirement for prior approval of shareholders by a special resolution and inprinciple approval from the stock exchange, to reduce the delisting process timeline. Sebi has decided on doing away with the requirement of a postal ballot from shareholders, to address corporate governance concerns that would have arisen otherwise. "While Sebi had incorporated other suggestions as part of the discussion paper, it did not necessarily endorse them. Now, only a one- time approval from shareholders and in- principle approval from stock exchanges ( to be given within five days) would be required for delisting to go through," said a source.

Currently the in- principle approval from stock exchanges takes a month and a postal ballot from shareholders could take close to two months.

Market participants say the existing delisting norms that were aimed at protecting investors also made it difficult for companies to delist. " The huge time period that came with delisting gave certain entities an opportunity to take significant positions in the company, thereby influencing price discovery. The promoters in some instances have had to pay significant premium over the market price, so reducing the timeline is certainly a move in the right direction," said Debanik Basu, analyst, IIAS proxy advisors.

Sebi in its final regulations will retain the requirement of the acquirer to reach 90 per cent of the total issued share capital. Also, 25 per cent of public shareholders should be a part of the delisting for it to go through.

Legal experts opine that the regulator while making the final regulations should have provisions to tackle insider trading. To deal with the issue, the regulator is exploring the idea that acompany could be barred if the promoter is found to be selling shares six months before the delisting proposal comes up for consideration before the company's board.

For full reports, visit www. business- standard. com

|Regulator to reduce timeline to delist to 75 days |Sebi to insist on one- time nod from shareholders |Bourses to grant in- principle approval in 5 days to delist |25% public shareholders need to participate for delisting to go through |Promoters could be barred if found selling shares six months before delisting is cleared by board GOING OFF THE EXCHANGE

 

--




A.Rengarajan
Practising  Company  Secretary
Chennai


Mobile 93810  11200

"
LET  US  SUPPORT  COMPANY  SECRETARY  BENEVOLENT  FUND  FOR  COMMON  CAUSE




__._,_.___

Posted by: CS A Rengarajan <csarengarajan@gmail.com>


receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.

To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com





__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment