Sunday, December 28, 2014

[aaykarbhavan] Judgments and Infomration [3 Attachments]







The Thought of Winston Churchill The thought of Winston Churchill, 'It is always wise to look ahead, but difficult to look further than you can see' means a lot. Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill was a British Conservative politician and statesman known for his leadership of the United Kingdom during the Second World War. Widely regarded as one

Adjustment of excess Service tax paid cannot be denied for mere non-compliance of procedure

Adjustment of excess Service tax paid, against tax payable in following months cannot be denied merely on the grounds of non-compliance of procedure
Jubilant Organosys Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut [(2014) 51 taxmann.com 64 (New Delhi – CESTAT)]
Jubilant Organosys Ltd. (the Appellant) adjusted excess payment of Service tax paid in some months against tax payable in following months and contended that adjustment was valid. However, the Appellant also filed refund claims of the excess payment of Service tax for dealing with the situation if adjustment is not allowed.
The Adjudicating Authority denied the adjustment of excess paid Service tax on the ground that the procedure prescribed under Rule 6(4A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 the Service Tax Rules) has not been followed and accordingly confirmed the demand of Service tax against the Appellant. Thereafter, the Commissioner (Appeals) also upheld the demand confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority.
Being aggrieved, the Appellant preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble CESTAT, Delhi and while relying upon following judgments contended that the adjustment of Service tax paid in excess, in certain months towards the Service tax liability of the subsequent months cannot be denied on technical grounds:
  • CC, Patel & Associates () Ltd. Vs. Union of India [(2012) 37 STT 370];
  • Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Vs. CCE [(2010) 29 STT 124 (New Delhi – CESTAT)];
  • Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. Vs. CCE [(2012) 36 STT 140];
  • BSNL Vs. CCE [(2012) 35 STT 628]; and
  • Nirma Architects &Valuers Vs. CCE [(2006) 3 STT 176 (New Delhi – CESTAT)]
The Hon'ble CESTAT, Delhi relying upon its very recent decision in judgment order No. 52863/2014 dated July 10, 2014 in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.,
held that the matter is no longer res-integra that the adjustment of Service tax paid in excess in certain months towards Service tax liability of subsequent months under Rule 6(4A) of the Service Tax Rules cannot be denied merely on technical grounds. Hence, adjustment was allowed to the Appellant and alternative refund claims were dismissed as infructuous.
- See more at: http://taxguru.in/service-tax/adjustment-excess-service-tax-paid-denied-mere-noncompliance-procedure.html#sthash.5rr9q83q.dpuf

The CBDT has issued a letter dated 23.12.2014 setting out the guidelines for compounding of offences under Direct Tax Laws. The guidelines shall come into effect from 01.01.2015 and shall be applicable to all applications for compounding received on or after the aforesaid date. The Guidelines classify offences into two parts and set out the criteria for compounding of offences under each category. The procedure to be adopted for making the compounding application and the manner in which they should be dealt with is also explained in detail.
 PFA

The Union Government in third week of December, 2014 (19 December, 2014) introduced Constitution (122 Amendment) Bill, 2014 in Parliament which when passed shall pave the way for introduction of proposed Goods and Service Tax (GST) in India.

Proposed GST – Still Miles Away

Posted In GST | | No Comments » Print Friendly and PDF
Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
The Union Government in third week of December, 2014 (19 December, 2014) introduced Constitution (122 Amendment) Bill, 2014 in Parliament which when passed shall pave the way for introduction of proposed Goods and Service Tax (GST) in India.
Contrary to the general perception that this Bill itself is a GST Bill, it is to be very clearly understood that this is not a GST Bill. In fact, GST Bill is not in sight at all at this moment. What has been introduced is the Constitutional Amendment Bill enabling or empowering the Government to levy a tax called GST which it cannot levy under the present Constitution. The Bill on passage would enable the Central Government and the State Governments to levy GST. This tax (GST) shall be levied concurrently by various states as well as Union Government. Once this is passed by two-third majority in the Parliament, atleast 50 percent of the states will have to pass it. Once this amendment is through, the road will be clear for GST Bill (and then Act). Eventually, we will have following taxes –
  • National level GST [Central GST (CGST) and Inter-state GST (IGST)]
  • State Level GST (SGST)
A newly inserted article 246A provides for special provision with respect to GST.
The Legislature of every State shall have power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax imposed by the Union or by such State. Parliament will have exclusive power to make laws with respect to goods and services tax where the supply of goods, or of services, or both takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.
Goods and services tax on supplies in the course of inter-State trade or commerce shall be levied and collected by the government of India and such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as may be provided by Parliament by law on the recommendations of the Goods and Services Tax Council.
Supply of goods or services, or both in the course of import into the territory of India shall be deemed to be supply of goods or services, or both in the course of inter-state trade or commerce.
Parliament may, by law, formulate the principles for determining the place of supply, and when a supply of goods or of services, or both takes place in the course of inter-state trade or commerce.
The President shall, within sixty days from the date of commencement of the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-second Amendment) Act, 2014, by order, constitute a Council to be called the Goods and Services Tax Council.
Going by the present mood, the Government of the day feels that it may be able to introduce GST in India w.e.f. 1st April 2016, replacing a host of indirect taxes presently levied by the centre, states and local bodies. It hopes for the parliamentary nod (two-third majority) in the forthcoming Budget session in February, 2015. This is necessary as the Indian Constitution requires amendment to allow states to tax services and the centre to tax goods at the retail level and to provide legal framework for GST by providing for constitution of a GST Council and dispute settlement mechanism.
One of the major obstacles, Central Sales Tax (CST), has been addressed as the centre has agreed for compensation on account of phasing out of CST. A compensation of Rs. 11,000 crores has been announced to make up for 2 percent reduction in GST rate to 2%. The Central Government has agreed for a five year compensation. Petroleum products shall be included in GST and taxed at zero rate for first three years. States will also be compensated for entry tax which has been agreed to be included in GST. The States also want compensation on account of central sales tax to be paid to them expeditiously before it roll-out from April, 2016.
While the Government claims that there was an over whelming support for the proposals on the Constitutional Amendment for GST which were arrived at in consultations with the states, there are states like Tamilnadu which is opposed to hasty introduction of Constitution Amendment Bill for GST in Parliament without evolving consensus.
There are few states which seek expeditious roll out of GST while others like Tamilnadu still want clarity on GST rates, revenue neutral rates, CST compensation methodology etc State like Gujarat feels that finances of net producing and manufacturing states may come under stress in initial years.
All said and done, introduction of GST is not going to be easy. GST design, structure, IGST, administrative arrangement with states, disputes between centre and states, multiplicity of authorities, different interpretations by various states, standardization of systems and procedures, training, need for huge IT infrastructure etc are some of the concerns which will pose challenge to proposed GST. Common date of introducing GST may also be an issue as few states may not cooperate, given the political compulsions.
- See more at: Proposed GST – Still Miles Away

Introduction- With an upsurge in financial accounting fraud in the global economy, forensic accounting has become an emerging topic of great importance for academic, research and industries. Forensic accounting is perceived to have evolved in response to certain emerging fraud related cases. The scandals that shocked the corporate world with classical examples being the often […]
PFA


__._,_.___
View attachments on the web

Posted by: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>


receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.

To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com





__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment