On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 8:07 PM, Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes absolutely correct. One should always bear to their professional ethics , ethics to all . Not only personal gain but over all. . For last many year , this reminds me about C A G emplacement . If you see historically since 1959/1955 or so criteria for emplacement of C A firms partner in C A firm reduces years of experience and all other criteria ?? The Constitutional requirement , controlling second highest category after President of India , contravening article 14 of Constitution of India. Who cares?Last 25 days I was out. I did not have any internet connection. My mail box is full with more than 9000 mails. It will take some time to all through.I can not remain silent over major issue. So I started with.this first mailSeveral years back I made representation to C A G Mr T N Chaturvedi. He told me to write . But within some one month retired from the post. One of the then CCM , from Ahmedabad senior most , temporarily posted after sad demise of one of CCM from Ahmedabad, told me personally at that time that what I represented is not so???!!!.Just go through the qualifying the requirement of C A firms from C A G empanel requirement. One partner to F C A , More than 3 FCA and more and more. You are deleted from one to another year...Regards,C A Shah D JOn Wednesday, 20 May 2015 6:44 AM, "'CA AMRESH VASHISHT,MODERATOR' vashisht_2000@yahoo.com [ICAI_CIRC_MEERUT_CA]" <ICAI_CIRC_MEERUT_CA@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
----- Forwarded Message -----From: subramaniam ravi <sravica@hotmail.com>
To: "amresh_vashisht@yahoo.com" <amresh_vashisht@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:41 AM
Subject: A request from a CA
Dear Sir,I have read your article and your voice regarding limiting the concurrent audit of Banks. I feel that all members should come out like you and raise their voice against any move which is restricting the scope of our profession.In this regard i wish to state that there is an equal injustice caused in limiting the No of company audits to 20 per member. We are not auditing companies like Reliance / Infosys, but auditing many SMEs with a TO of 1 to 3 crores. In many companies there are no transactions at all, but they are also in an obligation to file the return and audit the financials.This is purely limiting the scope of the auditor. There is no limit for a Doctor to perform some number of operations either on the ground that he will lack concentration or on the ground that equal opportunities to be given to young doctors. There is no restriction on the lawyers to take no of cases on the same ground. Why only a CA is restricted like this?.Please do write an article sir regarding this.Thank you in advance.RegardsRavi
S.Ravi & Associates,
Chartered Accountants,
Flat No.2, II Floor, "Kamalini"
New No.31, Old No.16, C I T Colony I Main Road,
Mylapore, Chennai - 600004
Phone: 044-24991120 / 24992848/ 9840110827
mail: sravica@hotmail.com
web: www.sravica.com
__._,_.___
Posted by: Dipak Shah <djshah1944@yahoo.com>
receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.
To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment