[aaykarbhavan] High Court Raps ITAT For Arbitrariness And Failure To Discharge Basic Judicial Functions

Dear Subscriber,

 

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

Hinduja Global Solutions Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)

Action of the ITAT in disregarding its own order without reason and remanding matter to AO for fresh consideration is "arbitrary" and "failure to perform basic judicial function" and a "lapse" which should not occur again.

The Tribunal should not completely disregard its earlier order without some reason. This is the minimum expected of any quasi judicial / judicial authority. If the Tribunal has failed to perform it's basic judicial functions in such arbitrary manner, the approach of the Tribunal must be corrected, so as to ensure that such lapses do not occur again

Regards,

 

Editor,

 

itatonline.org

---------------------

Latest:

CIT vs. Dalmia Dyechem Industries (Bombay High Court)

S. 271(1)(c): The rigors of penalty provisions cannot be diluted only because a small number of cases are picked up for scrutiny. No penalty can be levied unless if assessee's conduct is "dishonest, malafide and amounting concealment of facts". The AO must render the "conclusive finding" that there was "active concealment" or "deliberate furnishing of inaccurate particulars"

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: "editor@itatonline.org" <itatonline.org@gmail.com>

---

receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.

To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Visit Your Group

• New Members 3

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use