Thursday, January 24, 2013

[aaykarbhavan] Fw: Tender for 50cr turnover firm






Tender by-
 Proposal (RFP) for Outsourcing of Scrutiny and Audit Functions
By Excise and Taxation Department, Punjab Bhupindra Road, Patiala

Requirement

This invitation to bid is open to all companies registered in India, who fulfil the following eligibility criteria: S.No. Criteria Required Documents
1.
Company /Firm with a turn over of Rs 50 crores or more for the last three successive years

Audited Balance sheet along with IT return for the last three successive years
2.
Company/firm with an experience of auditing atleast 50 Governmental(Centre or State ) organisation in last two years
Completion certificates for the respective organisations
3.
Company /firm with experience in atleast 5 direct/indirect tax consultancy projects in last two years.

The detail is attached.
--- On Sun, 20/1/13, arun giri <arungiri@gmail.com> wrote:

From: arun giri <arungiri@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AwakenedCAs] Re.
To: "AwakenedCAs@yahoogroups.co.in" <AwakenedCAs@yahoogroups.co.in>
Date: Sunday, 20 January, 2013, 6:41 PM

 

It is equally our failure as ordinary members, for letting CCMs go scot free all these years.. WE should have held them accountable! 


On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Nitin Mahajan <canitin09@gmail.com> wrote:
 

There is a constant failure on the part of ICAI. Whether u take tax audit issue or bank audit or now this companies bill......... Every time we witness inaction from ICAI. Chair of council is becoming more like a chair of Member Parliament where the elected members are granted liberty of exploiting their allotted portfolios to the best of their own interest and not to the interest of members at large.


When it comes to Tax audit issue, we look at CBDT, when it comes to Bank audits, we look at RBI or Ministry of Finance...... When will the time come when our own representatives will fight for protecting the interest of members at large?????

If some member exceeds its limit of 45 tax audits, why CBDT shall take action??? If the quality of bank audit is poor which results in increasing the limit for bank audit, why CAs are left at the disposal of RBI??? And last but not the least, in case of new companies bill, why National Financial Reporting Authority shall monitor the quality of Audit reports???? 

Is our council so shameless or incompetent to take action against its members or it is so incompetent to control its members ???


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:13 PM, CA Brijesh kr Gujrati <cabrijeshgujrati@gmail.com> wrote:
 






Due to failure of ICAI as a regulator in new company bill a new authority is to be appointed for motioning members,  is it shameful to us. thatcouncil of  ICAI is working as a Borad of Director of  Private Limited Company.

--
CA BRIJESH KR GUJRATI




--
CA BRIJESH KR GUJRATI




--
Thanks & Regards,


CA Nitin Mahajan
Partner M/s Darshan Nagpal & Associates,
Chartered Accountants,
#780-F, First Floor, Sector-14,
Railway Road, Nanak Nagar,
Jammu-180004

09469171444




__._,_.___


receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.

To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment