| Banks seek leeway from RBI |
|
Mumbai, 5 January Bankers seem to be finding it difficult to implement the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI's) new guidelines on identification and early resolution of stress, though they admit the move is in the right direction and will bring discipline among corporate borrowers as lenders. Lenders have sought more time from the banking regulator, as they feel the 30- day stress- resolution norms are a bit too stringent. According to them, at least 60 days will be required to firm up the resolution mechanism, known as the Corrective Action Plan ( CAP). RBI's discussion paper on early recognition and resolution of financial distress has recommended that banks come up with a CAP in 30 days under a joint lenders' forum ( JLF). Bank of India Chairperson & Managing Director V R Iyer welcomes the proposal of having a definite timeline for bankers to act. "But the suggested timeline ( 30 days) to firm up a package is too stiff," she tells Business Standard. "Banks have to conduct audits, such as receivables audit, viability audit and forensic audit, before working out on package. These cannot be done within suggested timeframe. It needs at least two months to complete work," she adds. The CAP involves rectification — that is, obtaining a specific commitment from the borrower to regularise the account within a specific time period, without involving any loss or sacrifice on the part of the existing lenders. It includes restructuring and recovery of stressed accounts. At present, banks are not very prompt in working on proposals, especially when that involves a large number of lenders. Each bank takes its own time and, at times, it takes even six months to finish the work. According to bankers, their views has been conveyed to RBI through the Indian Banks' Association ( IBA). "This move will bring all bankers together at an early stage for the formation of a joint lenders' forum. We will also conduct workshops to take the idea forward. This will ensure smooth implementation of the initiative," said IBA Chief Executive Mohan Tanksale. IBA has sought time till the end of the month — RBI had wanted a feedback on the proposals by January 1 —to convey its overall views. RBI is keen to implement the proposals by the end of the financial year. Another issue bothering the banks is the proposal on accelerated provisioning. The central bank has proposed higher provisioning if banks fail to report their stressedasset status early or resort to deferring NPA classification. Turn to Page 7 > NEW NPA NORMS Say 30 days not enough to resolve stress; want higher provision norms deferred till economy picks up FEELING THE SQUEEZE RBI's proposals |Lenders' panel: Early formation of alenders' panel with a deadline to resolve the issue |Incentives: For lenders agreeing to a plan — collectively and quickly |Provision: To be accelerated if no agreement is reached |Future trouble: Expensive future borrowings for those not cooperating with lenders in resolution |NPA sale: Lenders could spread losses on sale over two years |More Parties: Sector- specific companies/ private equity firms encouraged to play active role in the stressed asset market |
Click here to read more...Turn to Page 7 >
| Click: Article continued from…Banks seek leeway from RBI |
| Banks seek leeway from RBI |
|
"The present macro conditions - characterised by a long spell of low economic growth, sharp rise in pool of stressed assets and a higher burden of credit costs - are not conducive for accelerated provisioning," says asenior executive of a public- sector bank. Bankers say there is a trend of minority banks ( those with limited exposure to a particular borrower) often not wanting to participate or putting roadblocks in the proposed debt recast plan. Banks have made a request to the regulator to defer the accelerated- provisioning requirement by six- nine months, or till the economic activity picks up. Those involved in the turnaround exercise for companies, on the other hand, say this is the right time to introduce accelerated provisioning. Nikhil Shah, senior director at Alvarez & Marsal India Pvt Ltd, the Indian arm of a US- based firm specialising in turnaround management and corporate restructuring, says it is feasible in India. It should be introduced now to mandate banks to recognise problem early and deal with it. When it comes to pushing for a change in management at companies that are NPAs or are under corporate debt restructuring packages, bankers are receptive. RBI is has been talking about it. It is difficult to bring management change. But, it could act as a pressure point. In the process, we may get professional advisory firms to ensure promoters do not use delay tactics, says Bank of Indias Iyer. |
| Common return for service tax, excise duty on back burner |
|
New Delhi, 5 January After a Goods & Services Tax (GST), implementation of another indirect tax reform, it turns out, is unlikely to see the light of day soon. The finance ministry is leant to have put its plan to harmonise service tax and central excise duty returns on the back burner. An indefinite deferment of this measure, meant to simplify business processes, implies assessees will continue to file separate returns for service tax and excise duty till a GST is introduced. According to officials, a common return for central excise duty and service tax was envisaged when 119 services were taxed. However, with the introduction of a ' negative list' for taxation of services in July 2012, it became difficult to merge the two forms. An internal committee formed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs ( CBEC) had made this observation. "The proposal has been discarded. There were many issues, including different periodicity of the returns and the new reporting format under the negative list," said a finance ministry official, asking not to be named. In the negative- list regime, introduced in July 2012, all services that do not figure on the list are taxed. It has about two dozen categories of services that are exempt. The idea of harmonisation was to introduce monthly and quarterly filing of returns, and payment of taxes, for both service tax and excise duty. Under the current practice, returns for excise duty are filed on amonthly and quarterly basis, while that for service tax is filed on a half- yearly basis. On the other hand, payment of taxes are not aligned with service tax returns. The service tax payment is made every quarter in the case of individuals and proprietary &partnership firms, whereas it is done every month by all others. According to the harmonisation proposal, the assessees who paid service tax of ₹ 25 lakh or more in aprevious year and new assessees other than individuals and firms were to file returns on a monthly basis, while the rest needed to do so every quarter. "This will improve cash flow for small businesses registered as companies or other corporate bodies, while it will make large non- corporate entities pay tax on monthly business," CBEC had said. Also, a harmonisation could have facilitated better audit by bringing down paperwork in filing of the two returns — from about 15 pages to one page. It was also seen as a precursor to the introduction of GST, which is to subsume most indirect taxes. But now the thinking in the finance ministry is that a single return will add an unnecessary process. So, it will be prudent to wait for the GST rollout. The plan to bring a single form for service tax and central excise duty was announced in Budget 2012- 13 by Pranab Mukherjee, the then finance minister. The announcement to introduce a negative list was made in the same Budget. Soon after, in April 2012, CBEC had issued a circular proposing amendments to harmonise returns for excise duty for service tax. These forms were never notified. The U- turn on the return harmonisation plan means another of Mukherjee's decisions has been reviewed by Finance Minister P Chidambaram. Some other such decisions are provisions related to the General AntiAvoidance Rules, tax demand on Vodafone, fiscal deficit target for 2012- 13 and negotiations with states on GST and Central Sales Tax compensation. Common return for excise duty and service tax was envisaged when 119 services were taxed |
|
This mail and its attachments (if any) are confidential information intended for persons to whom the email is planned for delivery by the sender. If you have received this mail in error please notify the sender of the error by forwarding the email and its attachments (if any) and then deleting the mail received in error and the relevant email trail in this connection without making any copies or taking any prints.
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment