Regards
Prarthana Jalan
IT: 'Earnest Money' not a loan or deposit; its repayment in cash does not violate section 269T provisions
■■■
[2013] 37 taxmann.com 349 (Gujarat)
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
Commissioner of Income-tax -VI
v.
Madhav Enterprise (P.) Ltd.*
M.R. Shah AND MS. SONIA GOKANI, JJ.
Tax Appeal No. 561 of 2013†
JULY 3, 2013
Section 269T, read with section 271E of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deposit - Mode of repayment [Earnest money] - Assessment year 2006-07 - Whether, where assessee-company, engaged in construction, repaid earnest money/advances to certain parties in cash, section 269T was not applicable as repayments were not in nature of repayment of loan or deposits - Held, yes -Whether, therefore penalty under section 271E for violation of section 269T, for making payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in cash, could not be levied - Held, yes [Para 7] [In favour of assessee]
Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt for the Appellant.
__._,_.___
receive alert on mobile, subscribe to SMS Channel named "aaykarbhavan"
[COST FREE]
SEND "on aaykarbhavan" TO 9870807070 FROM YOUR MOBILE.
To receive the mails from this group send message to aaykarbhavan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment